|
Housing
The oil companies were also their workers' landlords. All housing
was company owned and was assigned according to strictly applied standards
according to the occupational status and family situation of the worker
or employee. The assigned houses were under the complete direction of
the company. If the family of a particular worker expanded, for
example, the company built an addition to their house. The company also
came to repaint houses every two years. All utilities such as water,
electricity, and gas, the company supplied without charge. In fact,
dwellings were maintained to the smallest detail, down to and including
the replacement of electric light bulbs.
Housing Characteristics seen in both Private and National
Company Towns
- Workers: Single men lived in multi-roomed
barrack-like structures, especially in the early days of
the towns. Two, three, even four workers shared a room in
structures constructed of wood and covered with tin or "chapa."
Sanitary and laundry services were built as a separate,
communal building.
- Driller / Foreman: Separate buildings and better
living conditions.
- White Collar Employees: Single employees had indoor
sanitary facilities, and only had to share rooms in the
early years of their engagement. Their houses were usually
made of company-produced bricks, largely made from a mixture
of local sand and seashells.
- Family Houses: These varied in size, design and
comfort. A normal worker's house had one or two rooms and
a kitchen. Neighborhoods tended to develop quickly despite
the varied ethnic mix of Russian, Yugoslav, Czechoslovak,
Argentine, Spanish, and Portuguese families. Many families
would gather outside to escape the heat of their houses
setting up tables and organizing communal meals.
|
Housing Situations
Housing conditions varied somewhat between company towns.
For example, due to its size and an isolation that enabled virtually unobstructed
growth, Astra was able to provide better accommodations. None of
their workers or employees had to live out in the open, few lived in Comodoro
Rivadavia, and they did not have to build their own temporary living areas
in the oil fields. If housing was not immediately available, the company
provided temporary housing.
Geography also influenced the layout of the company
town. In Astra, the actual layout of the town is structured in a valley.
The single workers lived in barracks on the north side of the valley
and the supervisors, employees, doctors, and school teachers family
houses and workers restaurant were located a small distance from the
north side of the valley. On the other side of the valley was the employee
family houses and single employee housing and restaurant. The remaining
housing was situated near various areas in the oil fields, such as the
distillery and power station. Family houses for workers and employees
had indoor plumbing, while single workers had a sanitary area near their
barracks.
Joaquín Guerreiro
explains a photograph of the Astra housing
Clip
Translation
|
The hierarchical structure of the company towns was obvious since
each group was situated in its own area of the company town. But these
areas also extended to the joining of families. Below is an example
that was mentioned by the group interview of Rosa and Joaquín
Dias Guerreiro, José Tomé Gago, and Antonio Torres.
Divisions - Diadema
In the Diadema town, the workers and
administrators housing were divided into their appropriate
sections (like the other company towns). This division
was impenetrable. If a worker (male) married the
daughter of an employee of a lower standing, then
the family of the latter could not move. They had to remain
in their section of the company town.
|
Despite the tight social control, company housing provided
a fertile environment for workers to form close relationships with
others. The large immigrant population in the company towns was mixed
as people settled in different areas: single workers housing, workers
with families, administrators, etc.. Yet, people were also able to maintain
communication, traditions, and customs with their own ethnicity.
The Companies as Landlords
The oil companies had complete control over housing.
As 'landlords' they had the right to enter the worker's living quarters
or families houses and search the area. Even though the companies forced
many regulations on their employees, they also supplied them with all
their utilities - water, electricity, and gas - free of any charge.
|
|
Celia Maria Alonso speaks about company towns
from the viewpoint of those who lived in Comodoro Rivadavia.
Translation
|
Company control also included
the appearance of the house and what was grown or raised in the yard.
Families wanted to raise, pigs, goats, hens, and grow fig trees and
vegetable gardens. The company, however, wanting to avoid hygenic problems
too many animals would cause, kept a strict eye on such desires. And
when workers did not follow the company housing rules, they lost their
positions. A tidy and attractive garden was always encouraged and valued
in the company town, though, as the excerpt from a company circular
of 1929 below indicates.
|
" in many family houses gardens are very well tended, which
enhances the housing and reveals the preoccupation of their
inhabitants to improve the place where they live. In contrast,
in some houses, the terrain for gardens are completely abandoned.
This is difficult to understand because growing a garden
does not mean much work and it is also a sane entertainment
to spend part of the leisure time cultivating gardens...This
administration recommends that all personnel to look after
plantations, and residents in family houses should dedicate
the necessary attention to gardens, to tend toward your
well-being and contribute to the general embellishment of
the company town." (cited in Torres)
|
A Cultural Market
The workers of the company towns were
like a kaleidoscope of ethnic backgrounds. The animals and gardens
belonging to each family often represented the region
from where they came. The Portuguese and Spaniards raised pigs,
among chickens and gardens of vegetables, and were identified
with specialties of pork, such as chorizo (a type of
sausage). Polish families often raised doves, ducks, chickens,
and other animals. Families also would teach each other their
traditional recipes and exchange skills of gardening.
|
Regulations
Among other regulations, the company also
took notice of the housing of "paisanos" (those from the same homeland)
as a potential threat to the company town. These people, who were using
the facilities for a temporary period, were not employed by the company.
The companies were afraid that they might cause a social problem. For example,
Y.P.F. strictly stated that the housing, that included free services for
the workers, was not to be taken advantage by those outside of the company.
The companies also denied workers the choice of switching rooms or barracks
without permission.
Making meals in the barracks was sometimes cheaper
for the workers, and rules regarding the permission to cook fluctuated
throughout the years. Since the companies had their own workers' restaurant,
they did not want to lose money to other means of providing meals to their
workers. In Astra, workers confronted the administration about the wish
to cook in their own barracks and the company accepted their request.
It was also common for wives of workers to cook for single workers as
a means of contributing to household income.
Other rules focused on the theme of hygiene. Doors, windows
and walls were expected to be kept clean, and occupants were not permitted
to write or place posters on the walls. The rooms of the single workers
were also entered for disinfecting and the repainting of the walls. The
emphasis on cleanliness and social order can be seen in a Y.P.F. circular:
|
"In the coming period of hot weather, this administration
wants to remind its personnel and their families.....the convenience of
observing strictly...the prescriptions related to hygiene, recommending
especially frequent trips to the public bathhouses. Similar recommendations
are valid regarding the cleaning of houses, and especially single rooms,
because it is there where the carelessness is more visible and common, and
goes against the general well-being. This administration never believed that
personal and housing hygienic rules would have to be imposed on those who
live in the oil fields, but it is so due to the necessity of social order
and because the company is obligated to the public health and collective well-being."
(Cited in Torres)
|
(Click Here to View More Photos)
Housing Photo Gallery
Personal Account and Transcriptions
Housing Exhibit Patagonia 2001
Education
Health Care
Community Life Home
Source: Torres, Susana Beatriz. Two
Oil Company Towns in Patagonia: European Immigrants, Class, and
Ethnicity (1907-1933). Dissertation. New Brunswick , New Jersey.
May 1995.
|